24 November 2005

Israeli Air Force warns Lebanese of Hezbollah

Drops leaflets over Beirut
Earlier Wednesday, Israeli planes dropped thousands of leaflets denouncing Hezbollah over Lebanon's capital of Beirut and its southern province in an attempt to galvanize the Lebanese people against the guerrilla group. "Hezbollah is causing enormous harm to Lebanon," the leaflets said in Arabic, adding that Israel is determined to protect its citizens.

Harry Reid says...

state-by-state rundown

of GOP scandals. Wow, that's one criminal party.

23 November 2005

quick hits...

the Oxford Research Group says the Iraq war may go for decades Was the American public intentionally misled into war? Murray Waas' latest suggests: yes, Think Progress agrees. If you're a Hurricane Katrina evacuee living in a hotel in Texas, Louisiana, Florida, Mississippi, Alabama, California, Tennessee, Arkansas or Nevada; have access to a computer, and for no good reason whatsoever have accidentally stumbled upon this blog entry... FEMA brings you good news: FEMA will keep paying for that shitty hotel room you're in for 6 more weeks. Your hometown is probably screwed though. The Yemeni guy who was holding those hostages must have realized they were Swiss and released them. They plan to continue their tour of sunny Yemen. Eric Martin beats his head against the wall dealing with the latest lies from Dick Cheney. Who, it should be noted, is showing very respectable creativity with his latest fear-mongering:
First Rumsfeld tried his hand at solidifying American resolve with some pretty outlandish scare tactics (discussed here). It shouldn't surprise anyone that Cheney would upstage him with an even more fantastical fable:
"Would the United States and other free nations be better off or worse off with (Abu Musab al-) Zarqawi, (Osama) bin Laden and (Ayman al-) Zawahiri in control of Iraq?" he asked. "Would be we safer or less safe with Iraq ruled by men intent on the destruction of our country?"
Wow. The un-holy trinity of Bin Laden, Zawahiri and Zarqawi. Rumsfeld was far too bashful with his choice of only one bogeyman. Should I point out what a big favor it would be to us if Bin Laden and Zawahiri decided to come out of hiding and take up residence in one of Saddam's palaces? Out in the open? Within range of an air strike even if our troops are out of country? Regardless, I don't really think I need to explain how utterly and completely out of the realm of possibility such an al-Qaeda led coup would be. But could someone please explain how someone who would spout such nonsense on a regular basis holds such a high public office? Can't the GOP do better than this? Are there really three years left for this administration?

22 November 2005

boy mayor

Here's what I wanna know... why is he only now (as a senior) taking Algebra?

oh $@*%

There's a Freakonomics blog. And I'm totally with Kos on this one. I considered throwing the rest of my Starbucks coffee at one of those schmucks today, until I remembered that I paid four friggin dollars for it.

Jeremy Miljour and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day

Damn, dude should have stayed in bed that day. While he had a grand ole time getting wasted, then naked, then breaking windows and finally accosting unsuspecting women... the second-half of his day wasn't quite as fun (well, not for him anyway). He was later arrested, shot in the nuts with a Taser, taken to a hospital, and hauled away to jail.

the death penalty is wasteful

and provides absolutley no social benefit whatsoever to New Jersey. And considering that Texas apparently just executed an innocent man, maybe this is the appropriate time to reconsider the whole notion of state-sponsored murder.

Still no Oreos

this morning's conversation with Jay Rosen

during a live online chat this morning, Jay Rosen, author of the blog PressThink fielded questions from Washington Post readers and shared some of his thoughts on a variety of issues. Among them: the current state of traditional journalism in the wake of the Judith Miller (and now Bob Woodward) 'scandals', Bob Woodward's fate, the importance of accuracy in reporting and the same for blogging, and the overall impact of weblogs on the mainstream media. Check it out. An excerpt:

Richmond, Va.: Dear Mr. Rosen,

Much of the mainstream TV/News Media is ultimately owned by a small number of people. How do you think the rise of the Internet, and blogging specifically, undermined the ability of this small group to influence our perception of the news?

Jay Rosen: Very effectively and completely. That's how.

'legitimate right of resistance'...? Whatever

Iraqi opposition forces have a 'legitimate right' of resistance, according to Iraqi leaders who have now called for the withdrawal of American troops "according to a timetable, through putting in place an immediate national program to rebuild the armed forces ... control the borders and the security situation". How long before the not-so-esteemed One-Termer from Ohio proclaims the new Iraqi government is filled with cowards?

What are the Limits of Presidential Power?

The subject of debate between John Yoo and Neil Kinkopf in the most recent edition of Legal Affairs.

Bob Novak: vampire, decidedly non-objective and...

First-class pugilist
Don't mess with columnist Bob Novak when he's on his way to a Maryland basketball game. Novak, the enigmatic center of the CIA leak scandal, was headed to Hawaii Saturday morning to watch his beloved Terrapins play in the Maui Invitational tournament when he tangled with a fellow traveler. According to our unofficial mascot on the flight, Novak was boarding an American flight to Chicago when he cut in front of another passenger while entering first class. The guy protested and laid a hand on Novak -- who responded by socking him and threatening to knock his teeth out. Not mild-mannered Bob? We reached Novak in Maui, just minutes into yesterday's game. "Some guy pushed me and I pushed him back," he said, shouting into the phone from the stands. "That's all there was to it." Both offending parties were scolded by airline staff and huffed to their respective seats. And did you learn something from this experience, Bob? "No, nothing."

Padilla indicted

Finally
A federal grand jury in Miami returned an 11-count indictment [PDF text] charging Padilla with conspiracy to murder US nationals, conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists, and providing material support to terrorists. Four other defendants were also named in the indictment, including Canadian national Kassem Daher, and three others who have previously been charged with terrorism-related crimes - Adham Hassoun, Mohamed Youssef and Kifah Jayyousi. According to the indictment, the five defendants were part of a North American cell designed to send money and recruits to support overseas terror operations. The charges carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

he said what she said he didn't say

So, Jean Schmidt is not only an unpatriotic chickenhawk freshman, but she's also a liar. Good to know.

Three days after Rep. Jean Schmidt was booed off the House floor for saying that "cowards cut and run, Marines never do," the Ohioan she quoted disputed the comments.

Danny Bubp, a freshman state representative who is a colonel in the Marine Corps Reserve, told The Enquirer that he never mentioned Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., by name when talking with Schmidt, and he would never call a fellow Marine a coward.

~ "There was no discussion of him personally being a coward or about any person being a coward," Bubp said. "My message to the folks in Washington, D.C., and to all the Congress people up there, is to stay the course. We cannot leave Iraq or cut and run - any terminology that you want to use."
And, she [was, until this morning] in violation of House Ethics rules. Way to burst onto the scene, Madam 1-Term.

you got that right

awesome

GOOD STUFF: more from TPM on Scanlon/Abramoff, and... Coming Soon: TPMmuckraker.com?

scha·den·freu·de

Josh Marshall's latest on Abramoff:
Today must have been a very bad day for a handful of members of Congress, numerous current and former Hill staffers and others as yet unnamed.

United States vs. Michael Scanlon: wide GOP complicity?

POGO has a copy of the indictment, along with emails released as part of the investigation... which, actually, are pretty damn funny. Here's one:
Abramoff to Ralph Reed: 'full page ad attacking Cornyn in the Washington Post today...' Reed to Abramoff: 'wow. these guys are really playing hard ball. they also did a full page ad in the austin-american today. do you know who their consultant(s) are? Jack Abramoff... tough guy: "we'll find out who and make sure all our friends crush them like bugs"
man, you can't make this shit up. How's that working out for you Jack? You clumsy frickin' dumbass... also this article, which will appear on the front page of tomorrow's Washington Post, contains some interesting revelations:
Scanlon, a 35-year-old former public relations executive, faces a maximum five years in prison and a $250,000 fine, but the penalty could be reduced depending on the level of his cooperation with prosecutors. His help is expected to be crucial to the Justice Department's wide-ranging Abramoff investigation, which began early last year after the revelation that Scanlon and the lobbyist took in tens of millions of dollars from Indian tribes unaware of their secret partnership to jack up fees and split profits. Investigators are looking at half a dozen members of Congress, current and former senior Hill aides, a former deputy secretary of the interior, and Abramoff's former lobbying colleagues, according to sources familiar with the probe who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

21 November 2005

Ariel Sharon's Party of ....

Peace? Haaretz' latest poll foretells nothing but bad things for the dying Likuds. Will Netanyahu come to their rescue?
Were the elections to the 17th Knesset to be held now, Ariel Sharon would win a third term in office as prime minister and could set up a center-left coalition with Labor, Shinui and Meretz-Yahad that would have 66 seats. These are the findings of the Haaretz-Dialog survey, conducted by Prof. Camil Fuchs Monday night among a representative sample of 600 Israelis from all sectors of the population. Sharon would also be able to set up a coalition with Labor and the ultra-Orthodox that would have 71 seats in the Knesset.

appointment television

FRONTLINE: The Storm, tomorrow night... 9pm... PBS

Q: What does the Enron case have in common with high-profile drug and Mafia cases?

bad news for Bill O'Reilly

he's been Google bombed, and from this point forward will be referred to by his new name:Terrorist Sympathizer Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. Really.

one for the 'good idea' file

re-posted in entirety... because it needs to be:
Iraq: instead of benchmarks to get out, benchmarks to stay in

Posted by Suzanne Nossel

Instead of benchmarks to get the US out of Iraq, how about benchmarks to determine whether we stay in?

Here's the logic: the Administration persistently maintains that we're making great progress in Iraq. The American people have grave and growing doubts. If, as the daily news would lead one to believe, Iraq is spiraling closer to civil war, then our presence is at best a finger in the dyke. We hold on as long as we can to delay collapse, but meanwhile lose lives and deplete our military, when its just a matter of time before we pull away and the country disintegrates (with, if Bush is lucky, a decent interval in-between).

To decide whether we're better off leaving now, or waiting until some unknown future point when Iraq can stand on its two feet, we need to verify the credibility of the Administration's claim that it is making progress. Condi Rice outlined the Administration's strategy for Iraq a few weeks ago as "clear, hold, build." So how about the Congress giving the Administration 10 weeks, until the end of January, 2006 to demonstrate the following:

- Getting the number of Iraqi military battalions capable of fighting independently of the US up from 1 to 5;

- Per Rice's strategy, identify up front 5 secure areas formerly occupied by insurgents and ensure that, safeguarded by Iraqi rather than US forces (but with American advisers if needed) they stay secure (i.e. no IEDs, no suicide attacks) over the coming 10 weeks;

- Secure commitments of 5000 additional (truly new) foreign troops to be deployed to Iraq in support of the US-led operation (note that the Koreans, within a day of Bush's meeting with Roh, have just announced they're pulling out a third of their troops).

The Government Accountability Office can certify whether these benchmarks are met.

You could argue that these requirements aren't rigorous enough but I would frankly be impressed if the Administration could accomplish all 3 by late January. Coupled with a successful election in December, it might help rebuild confidence in the mission.

If these benchmarks are met, would that not mean that we could start withdrawing US troops, rather than deciding to leave them in? Rest assured: if we ever start seeing solid evidence that Iraq is capable of securing itself and holding its own politically, there won't be a politician or a wonk in America who doesn't favor starting to pull out.

There's no disagreement between Republicans and Democrats when it comes to getting out if sufficient political and military progress can be made. We disagree about whether to stay in given the manifest absence of progress. So let's create some concrete benchmarks that allow us to evaluate whether "mission accomplished" is actually accomplishing anything at this point.

ummm... several nutcases, actually

David Corn's take on the latest LATimes' curveball article: Going to war on the Word of a Nutcase?

"Why Iraq war support fell so fast"

Christian Science Monitor has this article today, along with this graphic depicting public opinion regarding Iraq, Vietnam and Korea. A glaring omission from the article's conclusions: The absence of a threat, the incessant push to manufacture one, and the public's distaste for jingoistic exaggeration (though it does discuss the failure to locate WMDs).

drip, drip, drip

"I'm embarrassed the United States has a vice president for torture"

"not a partisan gunslinger"

If anything out of Novak's mouth is to be believed, this one statement does lend credibility to Isikoff's latest suggestion that Woodward and Novak may have shared the same source: Richard Armitage
"They turn in clusters, because their roots connect them."

whopping overstatement

but hey, whatever. I'll take it... on former Virginia Governor Mark Warner:

The Navy needs to review the Stafford Act

Northrop Grumman Seeks $2 Billion to Repair Hurricane Damage FEMA doesn't distribute money to repair damages sustained by other Federal Agencies, or the DoD, and most certainly not their contractors. If Northrup and the Navy want money then they're more than welcome to go lobby Congress.

a judicial emergency: part II

Henry Weinstein, in yesterday's LATimes, explains that as many as 2,500 offenders, many of them arrested on minor offenses, remain in custody in Louisiana (several without being charged) following the destruction that Hurricane Katrina wrought upon the Louisiana judicial system. Which reminds me of a not-terribly-dissimilar situation that occurred in Mississippi following the recess appointment of 5th Circuit Appellate Judge Charles Pickering. Pickering quit his position less than 1 year after his controversial appointment. [ps: The primary funding mechanism for Louisiana's public defender's office is traffic citations!?!?! That is hideous.]
"Louisiana is the only state in the country that primarily finances its indigent defense through traffic fines."

Bob Graham doesn't appreciate being lied to

from yesterday's Washington Post: "What I Knew Before the Invasion"
[excerpt] The president has undermined trust. No longer will the members of Congress be entitled to accept his veracity. Caveat emptor has become the word. Every member of Congress is on his or her own to determine the truth. As chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence during the tragedy of Sept. 11, 2001, and the run-up to the Iraq war, I probably had as much access to the intelligence on which the war was predicated as any other member of Congress. I, too, presumed the president was being truthful -- until a series of events undercut that confidence.

America's tortured soul

CIA Veterans Condemn Torture
It's not just that such behavior is largely impractical, they say; it's that even by the morally ambiguous standards of espionage and covert action, the abuse is simply wrong.

interesting

Video in the News: How to Survive an Anaconda Bite
A researcher in Venezuela had to think fast when he found himself in a particularly bad spot—with his hand caught in the jaws of an anaconda. Find out the surprising technique for escaping the fangs of this reptilian predator.

who kidnaps Swiss people?

I mean, seriously.

Soros gets richer

Billionaire doubles the number of companies he holds

investigating the covert CIA prison system

Steve Inskeep has a conversation with Tom Malinowski, Washington director of Human Rights Watch on NPR's Morning Edition (audio available).

a quote that just "can't be"

"I didn't advocate invasion, I wasn't asked." - Donald Rumsfeld on THIS WEEK, this morning.
source AmericaBlog
And, as John adeptly points out, exactly how does a President go to war without asking the opinion of his Secretary of Defense or his Secretary of State?

new-found respect for Joe Scarborough

Never ever ever ever thought I'd say this, but Joe Scarborough actually might be an OK guy (sort of). I've always considered Joe to be a self-interested, partisan, one-track thinker, who often looked to argue just for the sake of arguing. But after reading his post this morning on Robert F. Kennedy (yesterday was RFK's birthday), I've found myself reconsidering some of that...
The last two years of Bobby’s existence were consumed by the prospect of bringing light to the darkest corners of our world. Whether in America or South Africa, Bobby Kennedy always questioned initial assumptions and never stopped asking “Why not?” In fact, RFK rarely backed away from any challenge. He was a liberal, but he was also a tough-as-nails politician who never feared political death. Now I look at those who followed in his path as Democratic leaders and have to shake my head in shame.
Ironically (doubly ironic actually) and equally unfortunate for the credibility of his position, Joe blathers on into his own tirade, and just can't seem to hold himself back from throwing unnecessary partisan jabs. But hey, he tried.

"it wasn't me"

So, basically the entire org chart just below the Oval Office has denied being Woodward's source... with the exception of Hadley, who prefers to sing and dance whenever he's pressed on the issue. I can't avoid chuckling when I watch these rapid-fire denials since its pretty clear now, despite the lies and stonewalling, that the outing of Valerie Plame was basically a staff function. It could effectively be considered a key responsibility of White House employment during the Summer of 2003.
"They turn in clusters, because their roots connect them."

insta-who?

this guy is a 30 watt bulb in a 100 watt socket. Pimping today's irresponsible NYPost column by Ralph Peters, titled "How to Lose a War". It seems both Mr. Peters and the rarely-insightful Glenn Reynolds have both forgotten Rule #1: the best way to lose a war is to lie your way into it, and refuse to develop anything that closely resembles a strategy, preferably before you get there. Leaving loyal and brave soldiers to waste away in the middle of Iraq without a clear mission is terrible enough on its own, but watching kinderpundits like Glenn and Ralph apologize for their actions while misrepresenting and distorting the words of actual patriots just takes the cake. Way to go guys. Why do you both hate America?

ahhh.... what an appropriate word of the day

sub·ter·fuge \SUB-tur-fyooj\, noun: A deceptive device or stratagem.

wanna get away?

George W. Nixon
source: ImpeachPAC

20 November 2005

Death Watch: Israel's Likud Party

AP reports: Sharon tells Likuds to F*** Off (sort of).

FEC: "blogs are press"

The FEC has issued a unanimous opinion that weblogs qualify for the press exception to campaign finance law. Robert Ambrogi's weblog Media Law has more.

The Man Who Sold the War

17 November 2005

with the world talking about Woodward (again)

what's Carl Bernstein up to?
“I think there is an awful lot of piling on,” Bernstein told E&P. “It’s outrageous to question Bob’s integrity as some seem to be doing. Anyone who looks at the record knows that it is the most distinguished journalistic record of our time.” Bernstein said he found out about the story on Tuesday when Woodward called him to tell him. “He called me, and told me what was going on. We both expected there would be criticism as well as internal angst [at the Post].”
So, do we have to wait for this source to die too before Woodward decides to crack?

and another thing on those f'ing voting machines

The RockRiverTimes puts it perfectly:
This is the only democratic nation that permits private partisan companies to count and tabulate the vote in secret, using privately-held software. The public is excluded from the process. Rev. Jesse Jackson and others have declared that “public elections must not be conducted on privately-owned machines.” The makers of nearly all electronic voting machines are owned by conservative Republicans.
Its your duty to fight against this. If you don't then its easy to say... you hate America

16 November 2005

altered, deleted, lost and miscounted

The most cherished and admired privilege afforded to all who are lucky enough to live in a Democratic society. A simple act that millions have died to preserve... now jeopardized... all in favor of these ridiculous fucking voting machines.

[GAO report (.pdf)] studies found (1) some electronic voting systems did not encrypt cast ballots or system audit logs, and it was possible to alter both without being detected; (2) it was possible to alter the files that define how a ballot looks and works so that the votes for one candidate could be recorded for a different candidate; and (3) vendors installed uncertified versions of voting system software at the local level. It is important to note that many of the reported concerns were drawn from specific system makes and models or from a specific jurisdiction’s election, and that there is a lack of consensus among election officials and other experts on the pervasiveness of the concerns. Nevertheless, some of these concerns were reported to have caused local problems in federal elections— resulting in the loss or miscount of votes and therefore merit attention.
And this excerpt is just the tip of the iceberg... check out the rest of the report. It's bureaucratically- written, so much of it reads like highly-technical mumbo jumbo... and it definitely takes 'no position' on the merits of the inherently-bad idea that is digital voting. But for those of you who think that digital voting machines somehow improve the accuracy of election results, or have managed to convince yourselves that we should let digital voting machines do vote-counting for us because you happen to be too frickin lazy... consider: 1) You deserve, and should require, that your government provide a paper trail... an accountable historical record of how you voted in any particular election. In several States this is already a statutory requirement... written directly into election law to ensure the sanctity of your vote. Many of these laws are under assault by the digital voting machine lobby (no, I'm not kidding). 2) Canada hand-counts every single vote in their nationwide Parliamentary elections, and rarely do they encounter vote fraud or other problems that routinely plague America's elections, and that the use of digital voting machines encourage. 3) On a recent trip to visit my in-laws in Switzerland, my wife and I attended a concert in Winterthur, a small town about 30 minutes outside of Zurich. Smack in the middle of the main corridor of their Town Hall was a large oak box with a slit on top and a lock on the back. I turned to the man next to me, a stately man who obviously lived in town, and asked "what is that box for?". He replied, almost shocked that I was so naive to even ask; "that's our ballot box. When we vote we write the name of the person we're voting for on a piece of paper and we put it in there". He went on to say that at the end of the night they simply open the box, count the ballots, and it doesn't take long before they (honestly) know who won. It takes a few days to compile nationwide results, but SO WHAT? Their elections are pristine. Is 48 hours too long to wait for the certainty that your election is true? Are Americans SO IMPATIENT that they'll trade the sanctity of their democracy for a few extra hours?!? Of course, by no means is Winterthur considered a 'huge' city, but it's population does exceed 100,000... and I'm certain that wasn't the only ballot box in town... but the point remains: Most election precincts in the United States support far fewer registered voters than Winterthur does with their beautifully-simple little oak box. It left me with 1 distinct and unavoidable impression, one that was validated later in our trip when the Swiss actually used these boxes to hold a nationwide election: They take their Democracy much more seriously than Americans do. They vote several times per year for one office or another, or a ballot initiative, or... well, for pretty much anything. And they treat this process with the utmost respect. But more than anything else what struck me was the Swiss both know and protect the profound strength of every single solitary vote. We really should take a step back and learn from our European counterparts. They do this much better than we do, and they rarely experience problems with national elections. If anyone issues a formal complaint based on the results of any of Switzerland's elections, then they recount every single vote. Period. End of story. They let their ballots speak for themselves, and it shows.

Jon Friedman hearts Chris Matthews

who knew that Matthews is 59?

woodward's super-secret buddy

yeah....

they shoot horses for being less lame than Weld

OK, it's official... uber-AG Eliot Spitzer is now clobbering Bill Weld (R) to such an extent (64% to 16%), that there is now nothing Spitzer could do to screw up the race for Governor of New York that doesn't involve lotion, moonshine, and a 1-legged monkey. 21% of those polled actually volunteered to the interviewer that Spitzer is the "best person" for the job. Thank you Lord.

amen brother

"let's unpack all the transcripts. Get it all out there. What everybody and anybody said. These guys are just as guilty as sin."
Josh Marshall, on the Bush administration's calculated and coordinated efforts to mislead, solely for the purpose of Manufacturing Consent for their personal pet war.

a gigantic assumption

"Interim housing is the responsibility of the state and federal government, and we have to assume they have a plan in place," he said.

who was Woodward's source?

Fleitz? or Combover? Pick one... I bet you have a 50% chance of being correct. [edit: That is, unless Woodward is lying, misspeaking, or suffering from severe memory loss.... this 'revelation' is getting weirder and weirder already, and it's less than 48 hrs old.]

SHOCKER: Oil Execs lied to Congress

about meeting with Cheney's secretive Energy Task Force, and 1 of them pours another lie on top of the first to cover his lying ass. Any question now why they weren't testifying under oath? And when will these idiots ever learn... ?
In a brief phone interview, former Exxon vice president James Rouse, the official named in the White House document, denied the meeting took place. "That must be inaccurate and I don't have any comment beyond that," said Rouse, now retired.

bush administration: immune to intelligent decision making

today's news on Woodward's link to the Plame investigation

seems to add a little flavor to this story.

15 November 2005

Bob Woodward was told of Plame's ID, but not by Libby

on the front page of tomorrow's Washington Post
In a more than two-hour deposition, Woodward told Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald that the official casually told him in mid-June 2003 that Plame worked as a CIA analyst on weapons of mass destruction, and that he did not believe the information to be classified or sensitive
This development (in part) damages Fitzgerald's case that Libby was the 'first administration official' to publicly leak Plame's name, but it should make perfectly clear, if it wasn't perfectly clear already, that the mission and motivation was simple: coordinate a campaign to discredit Joe Wilson. I'm telling you, it was all of them.
"They turn in clusters, because their roots connect them"

unnamed sources are cool

"What I'm witnessing right now is the absolute castration of FEMA by [political hacks] at DHS" - And unlike most 'unnamed sources'.... mine is an actual living, breathing human being with an absolutely impeccable record.

... trust ...

"I did not.... have.... sexual.... relations..." <--- Bush is losing to THAT!?!?
Some 53% say they trust what Bush says less than they trusted previous presidents. In a match-up with President Clinton, those surveyed say they trust Bush less, by 48%-36%.

when will they learn?

I thought it was "raining Oreos"... and something about "thick in the air like locusts"... Haven't you doofballs learned anything from the latest round of political scandals? Here's a great idea... how 'bout you just:
stop lying and start leading

Md. Gov's staffer linked to Abramoff scandal

Governor is 'not concerned'

politics heating up in Maryland

"For three years now, our state has been headed in the wrong direction under Bob Ehrlich, and Schaefer has supported him every step of the way." - Peter Franchot (D-Mont. Co.), calling out the former Democratic Governor of Maryland for betraying the Md. Democratic Party.

tampering with Public broadcasting from inside the White House

Pathetic.
The former chairman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting appeared to have been motivated by politics in recruiting a new board president, the corporation's inspectors reported on Tuesday. Their report into the activities of Kenneth Tomlinson said "cryptic" e-mails between Tomlinson and the White House indicated by their timing and subject matter that Tomlinson "was strongly motivated by political considerations in filling the president/CEO position."

Katrina: death toll still rising

Donald Bordelon

genuine badass
Morning Edition, November 15, 2005 · Steve Inskeep talks with Donald and Colleen Bordelon, residents of St. Bernard Parish, La., with whom he visited in the weeks after Hurricane Katrina. Donald is now back at work and Colleen is helping to clean up and rebuild the demolished first floor of their house.

this guy gets it

CIA Prisons, Not a Leak, Are the Real Issue Sunday, November 13, 2005; Page B06 Republican congressional leaders, by demanding a bicameral investigation into the alleged leak of classified information about the secret CIA prisons [front page, Nov. 9], are like the thief who, while robbing a house, was bitten by a watchdog -- and then indignantly complained to the police about it. What Congress should be investigating is not the disclosure, but what was disclosed: A contemporary gulag in which detainees languish indefinitely, subject to torture and unable to contest the accusations against them in a court of law. That last injustice would be formalized by rescinding detainees' habeas corpus rights under an amendment to the defense appropriations bill that was proposed by Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) and approved Thursday by the Senate. Congress also would be well advised to investigate how it let this state of affairs, whereby the United States has become synonymous with human rights violations and an attitude toward torture that is at best ambiguous, come about. DEREK FROST Bethesda

oh please, spare us the bullshit

"Judging by the statements made at the hearing, it appears that the members of the Committee are not fully aware of the significant steps Saudi Arabia has taken in the war on terrorism and extremism.” Saudia Arabia’s U.S. ambassador, Prince Turki al-Faisal [via Intelligence Summit Blog]

She really thinks she's hot...

but the certifiable nutcase thing is a bit weird.

Just got back from hearing the articulate sagacious Cheney speak in New York at the Hyatt and I am assaulted with this nonsense as soon as I turn on my computer;

Cheney's Presence More Scarce at White House (front page of the lefty loving AOL via TIME Magazine)

Hey guys , he was with me! Along with Sean Hannity (the best), Peter King (who I love), Thomas Reynolds, Denny Rehberg (best man on tax reform), Virgina Foxx and various other Congressmen and women.It was informative and exatly [sic] what I expected (they promised to cut the nut). Cheney as always was clear, brilliant, reasoned and spot on. The U.S. "will not tire or rest until the War on Terror is won," thank G-d, although I wish we'd call it what it really is "the war on Radical Islamosfascism". But it is reassuring to know that despite all out war by the left on this administration (divide and conquer), they have testicular fortitude.
Occasionally, when the urge strikes me to bang my head against the wall or remove all of my fingernails with tweezers, I'll take a peek into the Wacko-World to see what's on their.... ummm.... 'minds'. More often than not, I find myself chuckling at whatever this crackpot is up to, but this post takes the cake. This chick is, in a word, gone. Intervention will not help. She does, however, have a strikingly-strong sense for spotting radical left-wing conspiracies, an incredibly high tolerance for mediocrity and an irrational fondness for Sean Hannity. If you hate Social Security, kick gay people, club seals, or share her belief that George Bush and Dick Cheney the greatest co-Presidents ever to rule the Totalitarian Theocratic States of America, she's your gal.

desperate

"Mr. President, it won't work this time"
first line of E.J. Dionne's column in today's Washington Post.

14 November 2005

"cooking the books and politicizing intelligence"

larry johnson's latest... tellin' it like it is on the Bush administration's attempts to hide behind the Robb/Silbermann report to protect them from mounting evidence that they knowingly trumped up an unnecessary and dangerous preemptive war, based almost entirely on selective, false or forged intelligence.
Here is the bottomline. There is no such thing as perfect intelligence or perfect analysis. However, we do not serve the security of this country by perpetuating the myth that we went to war in Iraq because a couple of analysts believed Saddam's acquisition of aluminum tubes was part of a secret program to build a nuke. Going to war was and remains a political decision made by a President.

Sandy-Baby is pissed

Retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor... on the Bush administration's policies of detainment in a speech at West Point:
"What law governs the detention and interrogation of terrorist suspects?" the justice asked the future military officers. "And how are you to know what standards apply?" Playing off the West Point motto of "Duty, Honor, Country," she continued, according to the text made available by the court: "What does your duty demand? What does your honor demand? And what does your country demand? It is hard enough to answer the first two questions, but harder still when the nation's elected leaders are silent about the last." [NYTimes]

why can't we "Gray Davis" George Bush?

I mean, seriously, we need a do-over or something. This has to be a new low:
Fewer than one in 10 adults say they would prefer a congressional candidate who is a Republican and who agrees with Bush on most major issues, according to a USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll taken Friday through Sunday

Scott McClellan: not good at his job

quote of the day

"The U.S. Constitution may contain no express mention of a right to abortion, but the Bible contains no express prohibition" - Howard Bashman's summation of this NYTimes article

Viktor Bout flys again

no Oreos

add another lie to the list How to maximize the believability of your lies... ? Do it with devout certainty, and make sure to throw in 'I was there!'
"It was raining Oreos," Schurick said. "They were thick in the air like locusts. I was there. It was very real. It wasn't subtle."
Unless you're an idiot, who forgot that there were dozens of people who can contradict you.
"It didn't happen here," said Vander Harris, operations manager of the Murphy Fine Arts Building at Morgan State. "I was in on the cleanup, and we found no cookies or anything else abnormal. There were no Oreo cookies thrown." ~ Clint Coleman, a spokesman for Morgan State who was at the event, said he saw lots of unseemly behavior but no Oreos. ~ As for "raining Oreos," Coleman said, "I can tell you that did not happen."
[update: Atrios gives Ehrlich an award]

if you don't get it, you don't get it

What you missed if you didn't read today's Washington Post: CIA Article Sidebar: A Story of Deja Vu Some Critics See a Plame Parallel Sabin Willet, a Gitmo attorney, reminds us that public trust requires that Detainees Deserve Court Trials
The world has never doubted the judgment at Nuremberg. But no one will trust the work of these secret tribunals.
Fred Hiatt puts Iraq's life-or-death struggle into perspective:
President Bush can lash out at the Democrats, as he did Friday, but ultimately they are mostly exploiting public opinion; he is largely responsible for shaping it. And had he been more honest from the start about the likely difficulties of war, readier to deal with them and then more open in acknowledging his failures, the public likely would be more patient. A true wartime president, Lieberman said, would reach out regularly to congressional leaders of both parties. He would explain strategy, admit mistakes, be open to suggestions. That hasn't happened -- which goes a long way toward explaining why a war that should be understood as life-or-death for Americans too has become, as Mahdi said in more polite terms, a political football.
Sebastian Mallaby's excellent column (Class Matters), helps expose what is truly wrong with most of America's current policies; which seem invariably to favor the rich over the poor.... at any cost. These policies, and the politicians who fight so hard for them, are crippling our Country, and few in Washington seem committed to fighting for what's 'right' anymore.
Two months ago, in his prime-time address from New Orleans, President Bush called upon the nation to "rise above the legacy of inequality." He was joking, obviously. The president's congressional allies now propose to cut Medicaid, food stamps, free school lunches and child-care subsides. They do not propose to save money by undoing the tax cuts that have handed an average of $103,000 a year to people making over $1 million. This is a scandal, and not because every liberal spending program deserves protection. It's a scandal because, whether you support this program or that, inequality is growing poisonous. The meritocratic premise of this country, essential to both its political consensus and its economic success, is starting to ring hollow.
Today's editorial reminds President Bush that 3 years ago he made some promises, that (to this point) have not been kept. And finally, William Arkin's latest: It's the WMD, Stupid
The real truth about WMD is far more difficult for all of these parties: The threat of nuclear war today, or biological war, or chemical war, is no where near what it has been in our lifetimes. The worldwide arsenals of nuclear weapons have declined by more than two-thirds since the late-1960's peak of the Cold War. The likelihood of accidental or unintentional war has virtually diminished. The spread of nuclear weapons -- particularly U.S. and Soviet nuclear weapons, which were once deployed in scores of countries at hundreds of sites -- has significantly declined. The roster of countries out of the WMD business far exceeds the numbers who have "gone nuclear" in the past 20 years. ~ If you want to understand how WMD became the justification for war with Iraq, then understand that throughout the 1990's, WMD served so many so well. Saddam's pursuit provided the first Bush administration great Cold War-ish comfort. The massive failure to understand the extent of Iraq's program prior to Desert Storm led to a high point for United Nations inspection and disarmament work and mobilized the minds of an intelligence community otherwise completely bereft in a post-Cold War desert. Disintegration of the Soviet Union kindled a gentleman's non-proliferation salon. The Clinton administration discovered Anthrax and could appear actually forward looking on national security. The domestic WMD consequence management business was born, paving the way for the post 9/11 homeland security industry. ~ WMD was always good for a front page story. ~ There is no question that the White House decided cynically to pound on Saddam's supposed WMD pursuits to justify a war it wanted anyway.

the cost of dissing Detroit

$30,000
NEW YORK (AP) — The Sacramento Kings were fined $30,000 by the NBA on Monday for showing derogatory images of Detroit on video screens prior to their home opener against the Pistons. When the Pistons were introduced Nov. 8, the Arco Arena scoreboard flashed pictures of abandoned buildings, burned-out cars, piles of rubble and other negative images of Detroit. The Pistons won the game 102-88. The Kings apologized that night, and owners Joe and Gavin Maloof bought full-page ads that ran in The Detroit News and Detroit Free Press expressing "great respect for Detroit's long and rich tradition as a landmark American city and the incredibly positive impact the Motor City has made over the course of our country's history."

Cokie Roberts discusses her return to New Orleans

Rupert Murdoch: 'CNN is j-e-a-l-o-u-s'

"In this country, Fox News has gotten a big, big audience that appreciates its independence. There's passion there, and it's pushed. ... It has taken a long time, but it has now changed CNN because it has challenged them -- they've become more centrist in their choice of stories. They're trying to become, using our phrase, more fair and balanced."
View the entire conversation with this blowhard at Hollywood Reporter

power struggle in Iran?

There are signs of a possible power struggle emerging in Iran following the election of conservative President Mahmud Ahmadinejad. The president is believed to have a close relationship with a right-wing cleric who analysts suspect may have ambitions to replace Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
NPR has more (audio available)

America's Best Hospitals: 2005

The annual U.S. News & World Report list of the United States’ best hospitals is prepared by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. This year's list recognizes 16 hospitals, each of which excels in many specialties.

  • 1. Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md.
  • 2. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
  • 3. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
  • 4. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 5. UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif.
  • 6. Barnes–Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Mo.
  • 7. New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, N.Y.
  • 8. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C.
  • 9. University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Wash.
  • 10. University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif.
  • 11. University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich.
  • 12. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
  • 13. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
  • 14. University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill.
  • 15. Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
  • 16. Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, Calif.
via Infoplease

GOP election loser blames George W. Bush

New Jersey's Doug Forrester: where are this guy's politics of personal responsiblity?

America's Most Generous Corporations

Forbes.com

Top Ten Ranked By Cash As % Of 2003 Income

Company Ticker '04 Cash Giving ($mil) % Of 2003 Income
Target TGT 88.8 2.1%
Nationwide NFS 15.8 1.3
Coca-Cola COKE 67.2 1.2
Safeway SWY 35.3 1.2
Best Buy BBY 18.8 1.1
Bristol-Myers BMY 64.4 1.1
Boeing BA 43.7 1.1
Caterpillar CAT 32.6 1
Wal-Mart Stores WMT 197.7 1
Aetna AET 17.5 1

Martha Stewart: You're fired!

Blacks now allowed

The Theory of Natural Selection

A wayward deer from Rock Creek Park strayed into an area it really didn't want to be in at D.C's National Zoo this weekend... he was fortunately saved by zookeepers who distracted the rightful owners of the property.... a family of cheetahs. [from WTOP]

Bush: the National Security/wartime President

I’m a war president. I make decisions here in the Oval Office in foreign-policy matters with war on my mind. How's that working out for you Mr. President?
Terror For Export Iraq is the base for a new generation of jihadists,well trained in urban warfare,who have begun to take the battle abroad.

John McCain speaks out: loudly

Torture's Terrible Toll Abusive interrogation tactics produce bad intel, and undermine the values we hold dear. Why we must, as a nation, do better.

it always has been!

we just blew it when it counted. Amen to this column though.
It's Your War Now The nation's newspapers helped President Bush sell the war in Iraq. Now, three years and more than 2,000 lost American lives later, their editorial pages refuse to advocate a major change in direction, even with 60% of the public urging the beginning of a pullout. ~ It's time (actually, it's overdue) for newspaper editorial writers to take the lead in helping to bring this American tragedy to a close. I have been advocating this, rather fruitlessly, for over two years. I mention this not as an I-told-you-so but to point out what dithering has cost: 1,700 more American lives, and more fuel for the terrorists' fire. ~ The bottom line, which I humbly ask newspaper editorial boards to consider: Whatever your feelings about keeping Americans troops in place to protect Iraqi citizens, remember who is running the show back at the White House and Pentagon, and whether you trust them to manage this enterprise. Most Americans have already answered this question. According to all major polls, they think the president misled the country into the war and is not to be trusted today, in general. I'll put it this starkly: If you're not going to call for the impeachment of the president and the resignation of Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld -- and I'm sure you're not —- then you really ought to increase pressure on them in your editorials to change direction in Iraq, and begin a phased (not immediate) withdrawal.

Bush Rewrites History To Criticize His Anti-war Critics

look who's running for Congress

Coleen Rowley, FBI whistleblower and TIME Magazine's 2002 'Person of the Year', has announced her candidacy for a Congressional seat in Minnesota.... as a Democrat [CBS News]. more at ColeenRowley.org

uh oh

Google Analytics: now available

10 Questions For Ahmad Chalabi

in next week's issue of Time Magazine:
He was criticized for presenting dubious sources on Saddam Hussein's weapons and accused of giving U.S. secrets to Iran. But Ahmad Chalabi, 61, is back in favor. Iraq's Deputy Prime Minister spent last week in the U.S. visiting with the likes of Condoleezza Rice and Stephen Hadley. He spoke by phone with TIME's Brian Bennett from a State Department-escorted limo. You received the real Washington welcome. How did it feel to be greeted with protests and tough questions? The serious part of the visit was excellent. We had very useful discussions with the Secretary of State and National Security Adviser, and we addressed some very important issues about the relationship between Iraq and the United States. As far as protesters, I was told there were a handful. Did you make any specific requests? We put forward the idea that Iraq should buy American weapons. It will go a long way toward raising the morale of Iraqi troops and giving them something serious to work with. We discussed Syria and how we stop infiltration from Syria by getting the Syrian government to act responsibly. How much credit can you take for the U.S. decision to go to war in Iraq? The U.S. has been at loggerheads with Saddam (Hussein) since the first Gulf War, and there was a sense of unfinished business. There were many calls to remove Saddam's regime from power by American organizations. We were there, but we could not have much influence. We were an exile organization. Now that some of the Weapons-of-mass-destruction (WMD) sources you introduced to the Americans have been discredited, do you regret not checking out their stories more? The Robb-Silberman report said we had minimum impact on WMD intelligence as it related to the U.S. decision to go to war. It is an urban myth that we had ill-principled sources. It is our job to check to see that these people are who they say they are. It is the job of the intelligence agencies to do the serious vetting and checking. How do you feel about Judith Miller, the newly retired New York Times reporter who has been criticized for relying on your organization as a source for prewar reporting on Iraq's WMDs? I think Judith Miller is a good reporter. Over there she did very good reporting for the Times, and she tried to check the facts and examine the evidence. I think she has been made into a scapegoat for the media. If you count the number of newspapers and media outlets that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, you'll find many all around. What do you make of the reported allegations that you gave U.S. secrets to Iran? Those allegations are false. I deny them. I did no such thing. Have these allegations soured your relationship with the U.S. government? No one mentioned anything like that in our meetings. Why should Iraqis trust you to be Prime Minister when you've been convicted of fraud in a Jordanian military court? Because they know that this is a false charge. And they also know the record of Jordan being the hub of corruption on the basis of Saddam's illicit dealings. Do you think the U.S. should send more troops to Iraq, as Senator John McCain proposes? I think more troops in Iraq would make more casualties and would contribute very little to improving the security situation. I think the way to go forward is to arm the Iraqi army in a way that it can deal with the insurgency and the violence in a more professional way. The most important thing to do is revamp the intelligence collection. The trial of Saddam Hussein began several weeks ago. If Saddam is sentenced to die, will you watch the execution? I am against the death penalty.

"The Military Applications of Silly String"

seriously... who knew?

buried in lies

ya know, one has to wonder if the GOP has actually managed to convince themselves that the lies they've been repeating so often for so long aren't really lies after all. I think these people actually believe this shit.